SIKKIM OBSERVER April 28, 2012
China seeks package solution for Sino-India boundary
issue
Beijing, April 27:
Seeking a package solution for the boundary issue through a negotiation
process, China on Saturday said it would like to work with India to build up
consensus in order to settle the problem at an early date.
"China always holds that the two countries should seek
a package solution of the boundary issue through negotiation based on the
spirit of peace, friendship, equality-based consultation, mutual respect and
mutual understanding," Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Liu Weimin said.
"It serves the fundamental interests," Liu told
PTI in response to questions on Arunachal Pradesh Governor Gen (retd) JJ
Singh's reported comments that India should "move away from its
non-negotiable stand on the border dispute with China."
However, the Arunachal Pradesh Raj Bhawan said that media
reports about Gen Singh's statement on border dispute with China "have
been purportedly taken from a speech and the comments have been quoted out of
context."
Liu, on his part, said that "China would like to work
with India to build up consensus and speed up the framework negotiation process
in order to settle the boundary issue at an early date."
Surprisingly Gen Singh's reported remarks were not carried
by the Chinese official media which in the past few days was more focused on
the successful launch of Agni V and its implications for China.
Anna to visit Sikkim next month: NASS
Gangtok, April 27:
Anti-graft activist Anna Hazare is likely to visit Sikkim next month to lend
his weight behind those struggling to lead an anti-corruption campaign in the
State.
This was revealed by members of the Nagarick Adhikar
Suraksha Sangathan (NASS) who recently participated in Anna-led daylong hunger
strike at Jantar Mantar in New Delhi.
NASS members – Rudra Khatiwara, Basudevh Adhikari, YT Lepcha
and ML Niroula – who participated in the hunger strike said they have submitted
documents and CDs to Team Anna on alleged rampant corruption in the State
administration. They met Anna and Arvind Kejariwal in New Delhi during the
hunger strike organized by India Against Corruption, according to reports.
Those who participated in the meet said Anna and his team
will visit Sikkim next month to campaign against corruption in high places in
the State.
Charges against Karmapa dropped
New Delhi, April 27:
Indian officials said on Tuesday they had dropped all criminal charges against
a top Tibetan Buddhist monk seen as a potential successor to the Dalai Lama.
Police in the northern State of Himachal Pradesh filed
conspiracy charges against Urgyen Trinley Dorjee, the 17th Karmapa
last December, after authorities found more than $1 million in foreign cash,
including Chinese yuan, stashed in his monastery.
The discovery led to allegations in the Indian media --
vigorously denied by the 26-year-old Karmapa -- that he was a Chinese spy, AFP reported.
"We have decided to drop all criminal charges against
the Karmapa," state Home Office official S.P. Singh told AFP by telephone.
"The police and the government lawyers thoroughly
investigated all the charges and found no real evidence to pursue a case
against him," Singh said.
The Karmapa is revered by his followers as the 17th
incarnation of the head of the Karma Kagyu lineage, one of the four major
schools of Tibetan Buddhism.
He fled Tibet in 1999 at the age of 14, reaching India after
a perilous eight-day winter journey by foot and horseback over the Himalayas.
Recognised by both China and Tibet's exiled spiritual leader
the Dalai Lama, the Karmapa is seen as having the highest profile of a cast of young
lamas who might fill the void when the Dalai Lama, now 76, dies.
Since fleeing Tibet, he has mainly lived at the Gyuto
Monastery in Dharamshala, the northern Indian hill station that is the seat of
the Tibetan government in exile.
Officials at the Karmapa's office welcomed the decision to
drop the charges.
"We had full confidence in the rule of law, and knew
that the government would eventually conclude His Holiness was not involved in
anything criminal," spokesman Gompo Tsering said.
The Karmapa's office had always insisted that the money
seized during a police raid on the monastery in January 2011 was accumulated
from "offerings by devotees" from around the world.
Editorial
DISASTER MANAGEMENT
The Vicious Circle
Emergencies,
disasters, and catastrophes are not gradients, they are separate, distinct
problems that require distinct strategies of response. Disasters are events
distinguished from everyday emergencies by four factors: organizations are
forced into more and different kinds of interactions than normal; organizations
lose some of their normal autonomy; performance standards change, and; more
coordinated public sector/private sector relationships are required. Catastrophes
are distinct from disasters in that most or all of the community built
structure is heavily impacted; local officials are unable to undertake their
usual work roles; everyday community functions are sharply and simultaneously
interrupted, and help from nearby communities cannot be provided.
Climate change is a
multifaceted (from drought to flood) and multidimensional (from local to
global) hazard that has short, medium-and long-term aspects and unknown
outcomes. What we do know is that climate change is intensifying the hazards
that affect human livelihoods, settlements and infrastructure. It is also
weakening the resilience of livelihood systems in the face of increasing
uncertainty and frequent disasters. Climate change can increase vulnerability
to unrelated, non-climatic hazards. An urban earthquake, for example, hitting
when the elderly population is already suffering from the kind of heatwave that
claimed 35,000 lives in Europe during 2003, would be much more stressful for
such vulnerable groups. Alternatively, an earthquake during a drought may come
at a time when reservoirs and water pressure are too low to combat fires
adequately.
Another major
aspect of combating disaster and catastrophe, particularly in underdeveloped
countries is the corruption factor. The local administration realizes that
disasters and catastrophes offer an opportunity to earn a fast buck. This leads
to overstatement of losses to lives and properties during disasters. Using the
mass media, particularly the electronic media, the authorities paint a dismal
picture of damages caused by disasters to impress higher authorities and
financial institutions to pour in the much-needed funds to meet the situation.
Corruption does not end there; officials and concerned parties pocket huge
amount of money while implementing various projects related to the disaster.
Haphazard work done in these projects inevitably leads to future disasters and
the vicious circle goes on and on.
INTERVIEW Of
the Week
TENZING BHUTIA
TASHIDING HYDRO PROJECT CASE IN SUPREME COURT
“Project violated applicable laws”
Construction of hydropower projects in
Sikkim is again making headlines these days mainly because of strong anti-dam
protests in West Sikkim led by ‘SAFE Sikkim’ against the 96 MW Tashiding
Hydropower Project.
‘SAFE Sikkim’ and Platform
for Joint Action against Hydropower Projects recently jointly organized a
successful rally at Gyalshing, headquarters of West Sikkim, demanding scrapping
of the project
The movement against
Tashiding Hydropower Project took a new turn when Tenzing Bhutia, former editor
of The Sikkimese, an English
newsweekly published from Gangtok, raised the matter in the apex court
recently.
Bhutia filed a writ petition in the Supreme
Court (Writ Petition (Civil) No.101 of 2012) raising some important issues
related to the project. Sikkim Observer
spoke to Tenzing Bhutia on his submissions to the Supreme Court. Excerpts from
the exclusive interview:
Sikkim Observer: ‘Safe Sikkim’ together with many other
organizations have been consistently pressurizing the State Government to
abandon the Tashiding Hydropower Project. Why did you approach the Supreme
Court?
Tenzing Bhutia: The
State Government has not taken any proactive action to wipe out fears from the
minds of the people of the project area.
It has also failed to convince the people that dams and hydro projects
under development in Tashiding does not create disasters in Sikkim. The State
Government may not want to interfere with the power policy of the Centre which
wants to convert the North East States into a “power house” of India. Sikkim has
become a victim of those who are exploiting its river resources. Despite our
continued protests the authorities have remained silent. This has forced us to
approach the apex court to decide on the legality of the issue.
S.O: What is the
legality of the issue?
TB: According to
the Wild Life Division, Ministry of Environment and Forest regulations, no
project can be set up within a 10 KM radius from the boundary of a National
Wildlife Park. In this case, the Tashiding project is being constructed at a
site which is within a 10 KM radius from the boundary of Kanchenjunga National
Park. On this aspect alone, the project should be scrapped and no permission should
be given by the National Wild Life Board. The regulatory authorities seem to
have looked the other way and by their deliberate inaction they have allowed
the project to continue to violate applicable laws relating to religious sites
as well as to the environment and ecology.
S.O: What is the
stand of your writ petition on the Rathong River?
TB: For all of
us, the Rathong is a symbol of Sikkim’s faith and culture. The unique Bhumchu
ceremony of Tashiding is deeply rooted with the Rathong. The construction work
on the Tashiding Hydropower Project is destroying the natural flow of the holy
river to a great extent thus defiling Bhumchu. The State Government is taking a
double stand on the Rathong. You remember, on 20.08.1997, the 30 MW Rathong Chu
Hydro Project was cancelled by the State Government to protect the Bhumchu
ceremony. Chief Minister Pawan Chamling at the time of cancellation had made a
press statement stating that he would honour and uphold the sentiments,
religion, and culture of the Sikkimese people and to save the environment. The
Rathong Chu Hydro Power project was scrapped because of these reasons.
If the Loharinag-Pala
hydropower project on the Bhagirathi River can be cancelled under the pressure
from Ganga Mahasabha on religious ground, why shouldn’t Tashiding Hydro Project
be cancelled on similar ground?
S.O.: What are the other
issues highlighted in the writ petition?
TB: There are
several instances where funding agencies like World Bank or Asian Development
Bank stopped financing hydropower companies in view of mass protests against
such projects. The Power Finance Corporation of India, Rural Electrification
Corporation of India and a host of other public financial institutions provide
funds to power projects in India. Keeping in view of the prospect of these
projects a large amount of public money is being spent for the Tashiding project,
which is essentially anti-people. The writ petition has made a submission to
the apex court to issue a writ in the nature of prohibition restraining the
financial institutions and all other public financial institutions from investing
in the Tashiding Hydropower Project.