GURUDONGMAR-GURU NANAK CONTROVERSY
The latest story on the Gurudongmar-Guru Nanak controversy in Lachen, North
Sikkim, carried in The Week this week gives a distorted picture of the issue
that refuses to fade away.
There is no Chinese hand in the controversy. The issue needs a fresh look if the authorities are keen on maintaining peace and tranquility in this strategic and sensitive border State.
There is no Chinese hand in the controversy. The issue needs a fresh look if the authorities are keen on maintaining peace and tranquility in this strategic and sensitive border State.
The authorities have failed to take note of what I said in my book, "The
Lone Warrior:
Exiled In My Homeland" (published in 2014), where I quoted the statement
of the Green Circle (NGO) on the issue:"As you are aware, the Gurudongmar
lake is not only one of the most beautiful lakes of Sikkim but also held sacred
by the locals. The army, because of its proximity and influence over these area
cannot go about misrepresenting facts. Such gradual and systematic distortion
of history only serves to sow the seeds of discontent and tension for the
present and future generations...
Construction of a permanent structure at 17,200 feet with marble, chandeliers and works is totally uncalled for and changing the surface of the lake by moving earth to create parking space is most deplorable.
In an extremely sensitive ecosystem where even footprints stay for months, the army, we hope will take more responsibility and care of their environs which would be better served than find itself championing chauvinistic cultural imperialism."
Construction of a permanent structure at 17,200 feet with marble, chandeliers and works is totally uncalled for and changing the surface of the lake by moving earth to create parking space is most deplorable.
In an extremely sensitive ecosystem where even footprints stay for months, the army, we hope will take more responsibility and care of their environs which would be better served than find itself championing chauvinistic cultural imperialism."
