MY STRUGGLE – III: Dilution of Sikkimese Identity

   The sudden revolt amongst the minority BLs and their decision to boycott the polls was prompted by  the SSP and SDF’s decision to field Sherpa candidates from Rakdong-Tintek constituency in East Sikkim which is one of the 12 Assembly constituencies reserved for ‘Sikkimese Bhutia-Lepchas’. The Constitution (Sikkim) Scheduled Tribes Order of 1978 includes Sherpas, traditionally regarded as belonging to the Nepali community, within the definition of ‘Bhutia’ in Sikkim. The Representation of People Act 1980, while referring to the 1978 Scheduled Tribes Order, permits Sherpas and other scheduled tribes in Sikkim, listed in the ’78 Order, to contest from the 12 reserved seats meant for ‘Sikkimese Bhutia-Lepchas.’ This is because the new entrants to the ST list in the State fall within the definition of ‘Bhutia’ in the 1978 Order.

   The clubbing of 8 communities such as Chumbipa, Dopthapa, Dukpa, Kagaty, Sherpa, Tibetan, Tromopa and Yolmo within the definition of ‘Sikkimese Bhutia’ has been opposed by the indigenous Bhutia-Lepchas, who are against further dilution of their original identity and erosion of their political rights. It may be pointed out that the BLs are not against the eight communities being referred to as ‘Bhutia’, as elsewhere in the Himalayan region some of these communities are clubbed - and rightly so - under the broader category of ‘Bhutia’.

   The objection raised by Sikkimese Bhutia-Lepchas is that these communities cannot fall under the traditional definition of ‘Sikkimese Bhutia’ – the emphasis is on the word ‘Sikkimese’ and not ‘Bhutia.’ For instance, many people in the region, particularly the Nepalese, refer to Tibetans and Sikkimese Bhutias as ‘Bho-te’. Sometimes the Tibetans from Tibet are referred to as ‘Chin-Bhote’ and Bhutias from Sikkim as ‘Sikkimey Bhote’, meaning Bhutias from China (Tibet) and Bhutias from Sikkim respectively. Hence, the emphasis on the above context is on one’s nationality, territory and origin and not religion, language or community.

   The same argument may be brought forward while defending the unique and distinct identity of the ‘Sikkimese Nepalese.’ Sometimes the expression ‘Nepali of Sikkimese origin’ is used to distinguish between ‘Indian Nepalese’, ‘Sikkimese Nepalese’ and Nepalese from Nepal. It must be borne in mind that one of the basic criteria for grant of citizenship is one’s origin. Therefore, in both cases it is not right and proper to marginalize the original inhabitants of Sikkim or the three ethnic communities politically and economically through inclusion of other groups within the definition of ‘Sikkimese’.

   The Sikkimese people have been very generous, open and broadminded in dealing with non-Sikkimese residing in the State. What they expect in return is to view the present situation in a more positive way and display some amount of care and concern towards the growing feeling of insecurity and apprehension amongst bonafide Sikkimese for their very survival in the land of their origin. The Sikkimese people do not want to become refugees in their own homeland.  In every country or continent governments enact laws and frame rules to protect their own citizens. Why should the Sikkimese people be expected to always accommodate each and every individual who come to Sikkim and in the process risk losing their own rights, interests and identity.

   Open revolt broke out within the SSP when the Bhutia-Lepcha leadership in the party challenged Bhandari on the choice of BL candidates for the October Assembly elections. Bhandari’s decision to give party ticket to former Health Minister O.T. Bhutia from the Rumtek constitutency (reserved for BLs) in East Sikkim led to the resignation of three prominent BL leaders – Nima Lepcha, R.W. Tenzing and Sonam Lachungpa – from the SSP. What made matters worse was Bhandari’s renomination of the sitting SSP MLA, Mingma Sherpa, from Rakdong-Tintek constituency in East Sikkim, which was reserved for the indigenous Bhutia-Lepchas. 

   Former minister and BL heavyweight Sonam Tshering, who was expecting the SSP ticket from his home constituency of Rakdong-Tintek, was ditched at the last moment and this deeply hurt BL sentiments. The BLs expected Bhandari to seize the opportunity and honour his commitment on the Assembly seat issue but they felt let down again. Till the nomination of party candidates the SSP was doing extremely well in its poll campaign. Bhandari himself was pretty certain that he would make a comeback.

   The fact that the SSP chose only two Lepcha candidates from the 12 reserved seats of the BLs made matters worse. The Bhutias, too, felt let down as Bhandari selected only lightweights who were loyal to him. Gradually, a similar pattern also began to emerge in the choice of BL candidates in the ruling party. There, too, BL stalwarts were ignored or eliminated from contesting the polls through devious means.

   My editorial in the Observer (Sept 25-29, 1999) reflected the mood within the minority community: “Not only were the Lepchas thoroughly disgusted with the discriminatory way in which the SSP leadership distributed party tickets, even the Bhutias, who had a major share, were disillusioned. The SDF was expected to capitalize on Bhandari’s failure but when it, too, fielded a Sherpa candidate from Rakdong-Tintek, doubts and apprehension among the BLs surfaced. Furthermore, fielding of 4 Sherpa candidates from Ralong, where SDF stalwart, D.D. Bhutia, is contesting also sent conflicting signals to the people.”

   I reiterated the importance of the political leadership in the State to allot party tickets to bonafide Sikkimese from the three ethnic communities to contest from the 32 seats in the Assembly. If we genuinely and sincerely believe in our declared policy on the Assembly seat issue then it should be reflected in the choice of our candidates. Until the Assembly seat issue is resolved to our satisfaction major political parties, which demand restoration of the political rights of the Sikkimese people as per Article 371F of the Constitution, must field bonafide Sikkimese BLs from the 13 seats, including the lone reserved seat of the Sangha, and bonafide Sikkimese Nepalese from the 17 general seats and the 2 seats reserved for the Scheduled Castes in the State.

   Any deviation from this stand in the name of political expediency would be harmful for preservation of Sikkimese unity, identity and communal harmony. The need to view the October 1999 Assembly polls from this perspective was emphasized in  the OSU’s appeal on August 26, 1999, when the entire State observed the annual Pang Lhabsol festival, worship of Khangchendzonga, the Guardian Deity of Sikkim:

   “Two decades and six years back the Sikkimese people signed a historic pact on May 8, 1973. Leaders of three major political parties, representing the three ethnic communities of Sikkim – Lepchas, Bhutias and Nepalese – signed the Tripartite Agreement on May 8, 1973. The signing of this historic Agreement, which reflected the will of the Sikkimese people, was witnessed by the Chogyal of Sikkim and representatives of the Government of India, who were also signatories to this accord. The 1973 Agreement fully protected the political rights of the bonafide Sikkimese people. The Government of Sikkim Act 1974 and Article 371F of the Constitution, which provide special status to Sikkim, reflect the spirit of the May 8 Agreement and the Kabi-Longtsok pact.

   On this historic day of Pang Lhabsol (August 26, 1999), being observed as Sikkimese Unity Day, let us renew our pledge to foster peace, unity and harmony. Seven centuries back in the latter half of the 13th century our ancestors swore eternal blood-brotherhood pact on this day. The Guardian Deities of Sikkim and the Sikkimese people, who belong to the three ethnic communities, were witnesses to this historic oath-taking ceremony”.

   The appeal added: “This treaty of peace, unity and harmony among the Sikkimese people remained intact over the centuries till two and half decades back when the Kingdom of Sikkim became a part of the Indian Union in 1975. As we enter the next millennium let us not only look back to where we have come from but let us look forward and renew our pledge for a common destiny.

   There can be no better way to preserve our unity and identity without the fulfillment of our demand for restoration of our political rights which were taken away prior to the first elections after the merger. The Sikkimese people have the right to preserve their distinct identity within the framework of the Constitution as enshrined in Article 371F.”

(Ref: The Lone Warrior: Exiled In My Homeland, Jigme N. Kazi, Hill Media Publications, Gangtok, 2014, and jigmenkazisikkim.blogspot.com