SIKKIM OBSERVER May 12, 2012
Delay Namgyal sought withdrawal of graft plea against
Chamling from Supreme Court on March 22
Gangtok, May 11: Delay Namgyal Barfungpa and Pema Dadul Bhutia have decided to withdraw
their petition from the Supreme Court against the State Government’s refusal to
allow the CBI to probe corruption charges against Chief Minister Pawan Chamling
and his Cabinet members.
The two had filed an
application before the apex court on March 22, 2012 to withdraw their plea
against the State Government, stating that while it was financially and
logistically inconvenient for them to pursue the case in the apex court, a
similar writ petition was pending before the High Court of Sikkim.
In their application to the
apex court, the duo have stated: “That the above writ petition is pending
before this Hon’ble Court is presently at the stage of notice. That just
recently the petitioners have come to learn that a Writ Petition being Petition
(C) No. 54 of 2011 filled by one Janga Bir Darnal on 14.12.2011 is pending
disposal in the Hon’ble High Court of Sikkim raising therein similar question
as in the present Writ Petition, one of them being the legality and validity of
the withdrawal of consent under Section 6 of the Delhi Police Establishment
Act., 1986 by the State Government.”
As a decision in Darnal’s
writ petition “would determine the question in controversy to the satisfaction
of the Petitioner herein, it would be convenient both physically and monetarily
for them, who are the residents of Gangtok, Sikkim to pursue the above case in
Sikkim.”
“That for the reason
aforesaid this petition being filed seeking leave to withdraw the present Writ
Petition,” Namgyal and Bhutia said in their withdrawal application.
When the duo filed their
petition before the Supreme Court in January, the apex court issued notice to
the Central and State governments, and the CBI to respond to the serious
allegations of corruption against Chamling and other ministers of his
government.
A bench of Justice R.M. Lodha
and Justice H.L. Gokhale issued notice on a petition by Barfugpa seeking the
quashing of July 21, 2010 notification.
The petitioner at that time
said that CBI has enough proof of Chamling and his colleagues’ alleged
involvement in corrupt practices. Prior to the notification there was a general
consent under which CBI could proceed against any official of the State or the
central government in the State without any sanction.
In December 2012, the CBI
asked the State Government for permission to prosecute Chamling and was
reportedly turned down.
Chamling, who heads the
Sikkim Democratic Front, has been the Chief Minister of Sikkim since 1994. Presently,
all the 32 seats in the Assembly belong to the SDF.
Assembly seats are reserved for
Bhutia-Lepchas as per 1973 pact: Centre
BJP MP raises
Limbu-Tamang seat reservation issue in Lok Sabha
Gangtok, May 11: The minority Bhutia-Lepcha tribals got
another endorsement from the Centre on the seat reservation issue in the Sikkim
Legislative Assembly. It has categorically stated that the 12 seats reserved in
the Assembly are meant for the minority community on the basis of its ethnicity
and not for their scheduled tribe status.
In response to
a query from the BJP MP, Balkrishna K. Shukla, on the Assembly seat issue of
the Limbus and Tamangs of the State, who were declared STs in 2002, Union
Minister of Law Salman Khurshid last week in the Lok Sabha said the 12 seats
reserved in the Assembly for the Bhutia-Lepchas were as per the historic
Tripartite Agreement of May 8 1973 between the Government of India, the Chogyal
of Sikkim and leaders of political parties of Sikkim.
Referring to
Assembly seats reserved for the Bhutia-Lepchas, Khurshid said, “…12 seats are reserved for Bhutia-Lepcha not as
Scheduled Tribe but as sequel to political agreement in the year 1973 between
Government of India, ex-Chogyal of Sikkim and Political Parties of Sikkim.”
He said seat
reservation of the Limbus and Tamangs would depend on the latest population
figure of the State as per 2011 Census.
“It is learnt form Office of the Registrar General of
India that even though population enumeration exercise has been completed, it
would require more then a year to get the individual Scheduled Castes and
Scheduled Tribes figures to be finalized and published,” Khurshid said and
added, “Hence, a decision regarding reservation of seats for scheduled tribes,
Limboo-Tamang, Bhutia- Lepchas etc. will depend on individual population details
of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes figures based on 2011 census which is
still awaited.’’
Referring to the seat
reservation issue in the Assembly, the Union Law Minister also stated, “Any
increase / decrease in the present status could be considered only after wider
debate from all the Stake holders in the State of Sikkim.”
Sikkim BJP chief Padam
Chettri said the people of Sikkim are grateful to the BJP for raising the issue
in the Parliament on May 3. He alleged that even the two MPs from Sikkim have
not raised the issue in the House and have “completely ignored the burning
issue.”
“The Limboo and the Tamangs
were declared as Scheduled Tribes in 2002. Since then the Census of India has
been conducted and the population figures of the two tribes are available. I do
not see any reason why the reservation of seats for them should be delayed any
longer,” Chettri said in his letter of thanks to Shukla, who is in-charge of
the State unit.
SC directs Centre to probe graft charges against
ex-CJI Balakrishnan
New Delhi, May 11: The Supreme Court on Thursday directed the Centre to appoint a
competent authority to look into the allegation of judicial misconduct against
National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) Chairman and former Chief Justice of
India (CJI) KG Balakrishanan during his tenure as judge in the apex court.
A bench of justices B S
Chauhan and J S Khehar said if there is any truth in the allegations, then it
is for the President to make reference to the Supreme Court, on the advice of
Council of Ministers, for inquiry against the former CJI.
Saying
that the allegations made against former CJI have given rise to a 'peculiar situation',
the Supreme Court asked a competent authority of the Centre to look into
charges of misconduct against him, PTI reported.
The court was hearing a PIL by civil society Common Cause,
which had alleged that the ex-CJI and his relatives amassed wealth far
exceeding their legal income through benami transactions during Balakrishnan's
tenure as an apex court judge.
Besides allegations of misconduct against Justice
Balakrishnan, it has also been alleged in the public suit that his two
sons-in-law and brother amassed wealth disproportionate to their known sources
of income when he was in the Supreme Court from 2007 to 2010.
The SC asked the Centre to refer it to the President and see
if there was any prima facie evidence to support the allegations.
If found alternatives, the President should follow the
procedure prescribed under section 5(2) of the NHRC act, 1993 for his removal
as NHRC chairperson.
The provision prescribes the President to refer the matter
to the Supreme Court, which will form a committee to inquire into the
allegations independently.
A provision under the Human Rights Act says the NHRC
chairperson or its members cannot be removed from their offices unless the
President of India orders it on the ground of proved misbehaviour, ascertained
by the Supreme Court after an inquiry on President's reference for the probe.
A Bench of Justices B S Chauhan and J S Khehar had on Monday
reserved its verdict on the petition, which also sought its direction to
government to make a Presidential reference to the apex court for the removal
of former Chief Justice of India Balakrishanan's removal as the chairman of
National Human Rights Commission.
Justice Balakrishnan had been elevated as a Supreme Court
judge in June 2000 and was appointed the Chief Justice of India on January 14,
2007. He retired on May 12, 2010 after which he was appointed NHRC chairman.
In the last hearing on March 12, the Centre had told the
Supreme Court that it is probing into the allegations that Balakrishnan and his
relatives had amassed disproportionate assets during his tenure as judge and
submitted a probe status report to it in a sealed envelop.
The court after going through the report asked the
government to tell it as to what further action it intended to take on
allegations against former CJI and granted three weeks to apprise it of its intended
actions.
Sikkim High Court never asked govt to pass destruction
of records bill: BJP
Gangtok, May 11: The State unit of the BJP has revealed
that the High Court of Sikkim had nothing to do with the controversial bill of
the Sikkim Legislative Assembly aimed at destroying past records and documents
of the State Government.
OP Bhandari,
OSD (Legal) to Chief Minister Pawan Chamling, recently made a complaint to the
High Court regarding criticisms of the Opposition to the Sikkim Disposal and
Destruction of Documents and Records Bill, No 25 of 2012, which was introduced,
considered and passed on March 20, 2012 in the Assembly.
According to
Bhandari, it was as per “the desire” of the High Court that the Bill was
proposed to the Government for legislation. In order to “give due regards and
honour of the decisions of the Hon’ble High Court of Sikkim,” the State
Government “felt it necessary to pass a bill in the Sikkim State Legislative
Assembly and therefore the said bill was unanimously passed by the House”,
Bhandari said in his complaint to the High Court.
“The Opposition Political Parties are not aware that to criticize and
comments on the decision of the courts amount to contemptuous and the person or
organization criticizing the decision or proposal of Court are liable to be
viewed adversely,” Bhandari added, according to BJP Sikkim unit chief Padam
Bahadur Chettri.
“As such, I consider it my
bounden duty as necessary to write a complian/ letter addressing to the
Registrar General of High Court of Sikkim, annexing all the
documents/newspapers and letter and other evidence about the criticism made by
the various quarter about the said bill, to request the Hon’ble Court to take
cognizance of the Offence made by the Opposition Political Parties for
registration of contempt of court proceedings against them, if it is attracted
for commenting and criticizing against the desire of Hon’ble Court,”
Bhandari said in his letter.
The High Court,
however, has denied Bhandari’s views that it was on the High Court’s advice
that the Bill was passed in the Assembly. It reacted, “There are no
correspondences/ documents on the Bill between the High Court and the
Government”.
It said, “High
Court never desired the bill to be enacted by the State Government” and added,
“High Court did not ask State Government to bring the bill in the Assembly so the
question of quoting law as requested does not arise”. (Himalayan Guardian)
Centre to send fact-finding team to Sikkim on hydel
projects
Gangtok, May 11: The National Board for Wildlife of the Ministry of Environment is
likely to send a fact-finding to the State to assess all hydropower projects in
the State following complaints lodged before it on the fallout of these
projects on the State’s rich cultural and natural heritage.
This was revealed by a
high-powered delegation of the minority indigenous Bhutia-Lepcha tribals which
is presently camped in New Delhi and apprising the Central leadership of the
need to preserve the State’s unique cultural heritage.
According to Tenzing Bhutia,
spokesperson of the delegation, the team is being led by former minister and
Convenor of Sikkim Bhutia-Lepcha Apex Committee (SIBLAC).
Led by SIBLAC chief, members
of the National Sikkimese Bhutia Organisation (NASBO 371F), Monks of Sikkim and
Denjong Chyarig Chogpo met the Chairman of the National Minority Commission Wajahat
Habibullah at his office in Lok Nayak Bhawan on Tuesday and expressed their
thanks and gratitude for all the support and guidance being given to the
Sikkimese people from time to time.
The delegation requested the Chairman
to declare the Lepcha reserve of Dzongu in North Sikkim as National Heritage Zone
with a view to preserving their culture and political rights of the
fast-vanishing Lepcha tribes. The
formation of State Minority Commission in the State was also raised with the
Chairman.
The delegation apprised the
ministries of Home and Environment of the need to save Sikkim by scrapping a
number of hydel projects such as 97 MW Tashiding and Lethang hydro-power projects
in West Sikkim. Officials of these ministries were also briefed on the various
issues relating to Sikkim, the spokesperson said.
“The delegation appraised the National Board
for Wildlife on the latest of the controversial hydro-power projects,
particularly those that has posed threats to the Sikkimese dharma and lineage,”
a press release of the delegation said.
JUDICIARY SUPREME
Supreme Court Shows The Way
The Supreme Court has finally
nailed its former Chief Justice, KG Balakrishnan. It has asked the Centre to
appoint a “competent authority” to probe into charges of corruption and
judicial misconduct against the former CJI, who is presently Chairman of the
NHRC. Balakrishnan should honour the Court’s verdict and quit his office to
pave way for a fair probe. In another controversial matter, the five-judge bench of the apex court headed by
CJI SH Kapadia on Friday has issued
notice to all states and PIL litigants in the 2G scam case on Presidential
reference seeking its opinion on whether auction was the only method for
allocation of natural resources including spectrum. The Supreme Court had
earlier cancelled 122 2G licences, allotted during the tenure of former Telecom
Minister A. Raja, who has been jailed for alleged corrupt practices and is
undergoing trial. When the executive and the legislature are hand-in-glove in
looting the people it is the judiciary’s sacred responsibility to act tough and
show the way.
In yet another controversial
issue, which has been hotly debated publicly in Sikkim, the Supreme Court has
transferred a writ petition on the 97 MW Tashiding hydropower project in west
Sikkim filed before it by concerned
Sikkimese, to the High Court of Sikkim mainly because the issues raised in the
petition are “local in nature.” How thoughtful of the apex court to think that
way and allow the High Court to look into the matter. After keeping the case
pending for a long time former CJI Balakrishnan said it was not the court’s
duty to direct the CBI to probe into charges of corruption against Chief
Minister Pawan Chamling and his associates and left it to the petitioners to
approach investigating agencies on the matter. The reported withdrawal of the
graft petition against Chamling by some Congress leaders after Balakrishnan’s
verdict is followed by yet another petition filed before it in January this
year on the same issue. How the apex court reacts to the request for withdrawal
of the writ petition by petitioners Delay Barfungpa and Pema Bhutia is being
closely watched.
The people of India look to
the Supreme Court as an instrument of social justice and a guarantor of the
great ideals enshrined in the Constitution. When the political leadership and
the bureaucracy show a callous indifference and insensitivity to its mandatory
duties which affect the basic rights of the people and when the law enforcing
agencies exhibit their brutality in the process of implementation of law,
should the court remain a passive observer of the scenario?
The judiciary must strive to
maintain the respect it commands amongst the masses for its independence and
integrity. If the Court has become increasingly effective in its role as the
final arbiter of justice, it is because of the confidence the common man has
placed in it. Its strength lies largely in the command it has over the hearts
and minds of the public and the manner in which it can influence and mould
public opinion, as the distinguished French author Alexis de Tocqueville
describes, the power wielded by judges is the power of public opinion.The
citizen's disillusionment with almost all our public institutions and
functionaries has reached nearly its melting point in this country. In that
context, his last hope is the Supreme Court. Hence, it is important that the
Court maintains its effectiveness undiminished and reputation unsullied.
CBI freezes bank accounts of Reddy’s firms
Hyderabad, May 11:
The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on Tuesday froze the bank accounts of
Jagati Publications, Indira Television Ltd and Janani Infrastructure owned by
Kadapa MP Y.S. Jaganmohan Reddy in the illegal assets case.
Jagati Publications and Indira Television run Sakshi
Newspaper and Sakshi TV, respectively.
The CBI had directed State Bank of India and Oriental Bank
of Commerce to freeze the accounts of these firms in their city branches as
they could have “ill-gotten’’ money.
The investigating agency had so far filed three
charge-sheets in the case. The 88-page chargesheet names Jagan as accused No. 1
and has five others as accused, including a serving Indian Administrative
Service (IAS) officer, according to agencies.
The CBI had filed the first chargesheet on March 31,
followed by a second one on April 23. CBI sources say more chargesheets are
likely to be filed as the investigation into the case proceeds.
The third chargesheet contains details of undue favours
granted to a company called Ramky Infra during Jagan's father and former Andhra
Pradesh chief minister YS Rajashekhar Reddy's regime. Ramky Infra has been
accused of depositing a huge sum of money in the accounts of Jagathi
Publications owned by Jaganmohan Reddy.
The accused are Jaganmohan Reddy, Vijay Sai Reddy (Jagan's
auditor), Jagathi Publications, Ramky group chairman Ayodhya Rami Reddy, IAS
officer G Venkat Reddy and Ramky Pharma Ltd. G Venkat Reddy is currently the
district collector of Srikakulam.
All the three chargesheets have been filed following
investigations into the disproportionate assets case against Jagan.
Meanwhile, the Telugu Desam Party and Communist Party of
India (Marxist) on Tuesday wondered why the CBI was not arresting Reddy in the
disproportionate assets case despite naming him as the prime accused in three
charge-sheets filed in the court.
"The CBI owes an explanation to the people on the Jagan
issue. Otherwise, the CBI will be making the sobriquet Congress Bureau of
Investigation true," CPI-M Politburo member and State Secretary BV
Raghavulu said.
Sikkim awards for 29 notable
citizens
Gangtok, May 11: The
State Government has instituted the Sikkim State Civilian Awards with a view to
encouraging people to make notable contributions in their respective fields.
This was stated by Secretary Cultural Affairs and Heritage
Department Secretary Nalini G. Pradhan during a press conference here on
Wednesday.
Pradhan, who was accompanied by Secretary IPR Department KS
Tobgay during the press briefing, said
the Sikkim State Civilian Awards is conferred in three categories,
namely: Sikkim Ratna (Category-A), Sikkim Sewa Ratna (Category-B) and Sikkim
Sewa Samman (Category-C).
Pradhan said the State’s highest civilian award is given in
all disciplines of activities namely social services, sports, music & arts,
literature, trade and industry etc.
For the year 2012 no one has been recommended for Sikkim
Ratna. However, nine persons have been recommended for Sikkim Sewa Ratna and
twenty persons for Sikkim Sewa Samman.
The presentation of these awards will be made on May 16
(State Day) each year.
SC transfers Tashiding hydel project case to Sikkim
High Court
Issues raised in the petition
are local in nature: Supreme Court
Gangtok, May 11:
The Supreme Court has transferred a petition filed before it on the
controversial Tashiding hydropower project in west Sikkim to the High Court of
Sikkim.
Responding to writ
petitions filed before it by Tenzing Bhutia and others, the two-judge bench of
the apex court consisting Justice Altamas Kabir and Justice Surinder Singh
Nijjar on Tuesday said as the issues raised in the petition are “local in
nature” it should appear before the High Court under Article 226 of the
Constitution.
“Accordingly, let the writ petitions…. be transferred to the
Sikkim High Court” and “be treated as writ petitions under Article 226 of the
Constitution,” the order said.
Article 226 of the Constitution gives the High Courts the
power to issue certain directions, orders or writs to any person or authority,
including governments, on matters placed before it.
“The question raised in these writ petitions under Article
32 of the Constitution should, in our view, be first considered by the Sikkim
High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution,” the order of the apex court
said after hearing the petitioners’ counsel Prashant Bushan.
It added, “There are various issues involved which are local
in nature and should be considered at that level.”
While disposing of the petition, the court directed the
registry to “arrange for transferring the records of the writ petitions to the
Sikkim High Court, within a week from date.”
“Liberty is given to the petitioners in these writ petitions to mention
the matter before the Sikkim High Court for taking up the matters at an early
date,” the order said.
According to Bhutia, the 97MW Tashiding hydel project is not
only anti-people but also illegal. “The project violates applicable laws
relating to religious sites as well as to the environment and ecology,” Bhutia
said.
The writ petition has urged the apex court to issue an order
directing financial institutions such as the World Bank and Asian Development
Bank to stop funding the project, Bhutia said.
CVC to provide timely solution to graft complaints
New Delhi, May 11: After noting instances of delay in attending to graft cases by certain
departments, the Central Vigilance Commission (CVC) has decided to modify its policy to ensure
timely resolution of complaints on corruption.
Officials said the
anti-corruption watchdog is devising ways by which citizens' grievances can be
handled effectively and in time, PTI reported.
"The CVC has decided to
slightly modify its complaints handling policy in such a manner which would
make it more clear and to incorporate time limits for processing or investigation
by departments in matters of complaints sent for necessary action by the
Commission," an official said.
He said the changes will be
aimed at facilitating monitoring of graft complaints.
Among other measures, the
probity watchdog is also considering sending SMS alerts and emails to inform
complainants about the status of their complaints.
It has asked Chief Vigilance
Officers of all government departments to use a state-of-the-art online
application specifically developed for the purpose of dealing with people's
grievances and to check delays.
"The new measures will
be in place soon," the official said.
In a related development, the
Department of Personnel and Training has asked all its departments to strictly
follow a time limit of three months to decide on granting sanction for
prosecution of a public servant accused of corruption.
It has also asked secretaries
of respective departments to monitor such requests by prosecuting agencies and
submit a monthly compliance report to the Cabinet Secretary.
The CVC, which acts as a
nodal agency for the government to devise ways to check corruption, alleged
graft.
The Commission has an
anti-corruption hotline in which an aggrieved person can call to lodge a
complaint on unnecessary delay of work in any department due to demand for
"undue favours" or "gratification" by public servants.
SIBLAC seeks ‘justice’ from DGP for Bhutia’s arrest
Gangtok, May 11: Director General of Police (DGP) Jasbir Singh has been asked to look
into the arrest of Yapchung Bhutia, an active member of the Sikkim
Bhutia-Lepcha Apex Committee (SIBLAC), by the Sikkim Police.
Bhutia was “unnecessarily
arrested” by the police in Geyzing on April 28 when he was interacting with
panchayat members during a meeting of the Gram Sabha, SIBLAC said in a letter
to the DGP.
“The small squabble that took
place in the Gram Sabha with our member was, however, settled during the Gram
Sabha session itself and the Sabha was concluded with an amicable note,” the
letter to the DGP by SIBLAC Convenor Tseten Tashi Bhutia said.
But despite this Bhutia was
harassed and arrested. “A police officer cannot act according to his whim and
fancy. It seems a pre-planned intention of the concerned Police officer to
favour the panchayat who was a complainant,” the letter pointed out.
“Sikkim is a peaceful state
because the people are peace loving and Dharma lovers. But such an act of
terror by a police officer on duty is not only disturbing the peace and tranquility
of the State but also creating bad names for the department and government,”
the letter said and urged the DGP to give “justice” to the aggrieved person.
Governor BP Singh and
National Commission for Minorities have also been apprised of the mater by the
SIBLAC, a press release of the organization said.
Five-day Sikkim Spring Carnival begins on May 11
The five-day Sikkim Spring
Carnival, which began on May 11, is aimed at reviving the inflow of tourists in
the tiny Himalayan State. The devastating September 18 earthquake in the State
last year and the recent bandhs in neighbouring North Bengal have adversely
affected the tourism industry in the State.
Hectic preparations for the
success of the Carnival, which is being organized by the Tourism and Civil
Aviation Department, are being made by all concerned parties. Unlike before,
Sikkim has a steady inflow of tourists throughout the year. However, spring and
autumn continue to be the main tourist season.
According to Secretary
Tourism R. Telang, the carnival is being organized throughout the four
districts of the State. In the capital, food courts are being put up at the
Ridge Park and photo and painting exhibitions will be held at the White
Memorial Hall.
The festival include
traditional wedding processions, faith healer procession, exhibition and sale
of handicrafts and handlooms at the Directorate of Handicrafts and Handloom
complex.
While pujas and religious
dances (chham) are being organized in South Sikkim, yak safari, river rafting,
rock climbing, paragliding, archery are being organized in west and north
districts of the State.
No comments:
Post a Comment