RN Chamling finally takes oath
Assembly pays
tribute to Prince Jigdal Namgyal
Gangtok, Nov 29: Chief Minister Pawan
Chamling’s younger brother Rup Narayan Chamling, who was elected to the Assembly from
Rangang-Yangang constituency in south Sikkim recently, last week took oath of
office.
Speaker
KN Rai administered the oath to the newly elected during the Assembly session
here last Friday.
RN
Chamling contested as an independent candidate from the constituency vacated by
the Chief Minister, who contested from two constituencies in south district.
The by-election was held in September this year.
Rup
Narayan Chamling defeated Sikkim Democratic Front (SDF) candidate Kumari
Manger, Bharatiya Janata Party’s (BJP) Bikash Basnet, and the Congress’s Bishnu
Prasad Adhikari. The Sikkim Krantikari Morcha, which had a poll alliance with
the BJP, opted out of the fray.
The
Speaker and the Chief Minister in the
obituary reference on the passing away of Late Gyalsey Kushyo Jigdal Tsewang
Namgyal, former Prince of Sikkim, expressed their deep and profound sorrow on
the sad demise of late Prince, the youngest son of Lt. Chogyal Tashi Namgyal
who passed away on 30th October 2014.
The
Chief Minister, during the obituary reference, said the late Prince was fondly
remembered as Gyalsey Georgela, who received his education at the most
prestigious schools in India and was a brilliant student and majored with history honours. He was a man
of the people who loved him profoundly for his simplicity and modesty.
After
completing his education, the late Prince became the first Development
Commissioner of Sikkim and initiated various developmental works and made
immense contribution in shaping the state in the right direction. His demise
has created a huge void in the Sikkimese society, he said. He also prayed for
the departed soul and expressed his heartfelt condolences to the bereaved
family.
As a
mark of respect to the departed soul, the House also observed a two-minute
silence.
During
the two-day session, three new Bills were introduced: Sikkim Agricultural,
Horicultural input and Livestock Feed Regulatory Bill, Sikkim Determination of
Lease Bill and the Sikkim Anatomy Bill.
Sikkimese protested against ‘merger’ in
1975
By N G Dorji Khangsarpa
In
1975 near the last days of the reign of Chogyal Palden Thondup Namgyal, the
last king of independent and free Sikkim, when it was more than evident that
Sikkim was to be “merged” with India, the people of Sikkim and particularly
those of Gangtok and the surrounding areas, finally threw away the shackles of
fear and for two glorious days staged a major rally against Indian intentions
with Sikkim.
The
second day rally was short-lived after Indian Army personnel, especially some
Gorkha Rifle units and Assam Rifles jawans staged a flag march from the Palace
ridge down to Tadong army camp. This even as the CRPF personnel were busy
firing tear gas canisters and lathi-charging the people gathered for further
protests.
The
first day’s rally, however, saw at least four thousand people (a massive
gathering in those days of a Sikkim with a barely 200,000 lakh population)
march up to Mintokgang, which was then used as the residence of B S Das, who
was supposed to have been brought to assist the Chogyal of Sikkim, but was
working more on the orders of New Delhi. The protestors shouted anti-Indian
slogans and demanded that Sikkim be left alone.
Since
the rally was one of the biggest gathering of Sikkim’s population during the
last days preceeding the merger, the majority of Indian print media and a few
foreign ones carried stories and posted pictures of the rallyists gathered at
Mintokgang within the next few days.
However,
the headings and captions for that particular picture more or less, read:
“People of Sikkim from all walks of life surround the palace demanding merger
with India”.
Similarly,
with regard to the now famous Gurudongmar Lake and the recent controversies
vis-a-vis Guru Rimpochhe and Guru Nanak I have the following opinion:
Prior
to 1975 very, very few people actually went there, Sikkimese or otherwise. I have been given to understand by older
Lachenpas and Lachungpas that before 1947 there was no Gurdwara at the
Gurudongmar Lake.
After
Independence from the British almost 40% of the Indian Army consisted of
Punjabis/Sikhs, as the British had recognized and preferred them as a martial
race. It was no wonder that after the 1950 treaty between Sikkim and India, the
first units of the Indian army to enter Sikkim were the Punjab Regiment and
Sikh Light Infantry.
Though
their forward base was at Chungthang, the Sikhs would patrol the barren North
from camps situated all over North Sikkim.
One
such camp was near Gurudongmar Lake, where they set up a Gurdwara. Suddenly,
near the end of the twentieth century we are told that Guru Nanak had travelled
to Sikkim and was responsible for Gurudogmar being named after him etc. etc. (N G Dorji Khangsarpa is editor of The
Encounter newspaper)
FIX ACCOUNTABILITY
CBI Chief Cannot
Go Scot-free
Noted advocate
Prashant Bhushan, who represents the Centre for Public Interest Litigation
(CPIL), has rightly lodged a complaint with the Anti-Corruption Branch of Delhi
Government seeking registration of an FIR against CBI Director Ranjit Sinha
under the Prevention of Corruption Act (PCA). Bhushan, who sought a thorough
investigation against Sinha, alleged that Sinha had attempted to influence
various cases including the 2G scam and coal block allocation scam after
meeting the accused persons or their representative at his residence at 2
Janpath in New Delhi.
On Bhushan's plea,
Supreme Court has removed Sinha from 2G case last week for his interference in
2G case. Bhushan is convinced that offences of bribery can be established by a
thorough investigation and has sought for a "thorough and impartial"
investigation against Sinha, who is due to retire next week. The petition has
alleged that the CBI Director had "deliberately" tried to save
certain influential persons from prosecution in the 2G scam, coal scam, etc by
abusing his position. Those safeguarding corrupt elements in power must be
thoroughly exposed and accountability fixed if India is to forge ahead.
Japan assures China it will stay out of projects in
Arunachal
The Japanese side
has clarified that its cooperation with India is not in disputed areas between
China and India: Beijing
Beijing, Nov 29: China said last Tuesday that it had received a
"clarification" from the Japanese government saying Tokyo would not
involve itself in infrastructure projects in Arunachal Pradesh.
Responding to
reports in India which said the Border Roads Organization (BRO) had given
'strategic' projects to the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) along
the China border, the Chinese Foreign Ministry said the Japanese government had
made clear that it would not involve itself in projects in 'disputed areas'
between India and China. Officials clarified this included Arunachal Pradesh,
which China has territorial claims on.
"China has
noted the report and has checked with the capable authorities," Foreign
Ministry spokesperson Hong Lei told reporters, in response to a question on the
issue raised by an official Chinese media outlet at a regular press briefing.
"The Japanese
side has clarified that its cooperation with India is not in disputed areas
between China and India," Hong said.
While China and
Japan have recently been grappling with tense relations over disputed East
China Sea islands, relations have begun to thaw after Chinese President Xi
Jinping met Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe in Beijing last week, on the
sidelines of the APEC Summit. Both sides signed a four point agreement to cool
tensions.
India's BRO has
sought help from the JICA to push forward long-overdue infrastructure projects
in India's Northeast. The JICA has been roped in to provide assistance for a
number of road projects. According to the Japanese agency's website, it is
currently involved in various projects in the Northeast in Sikkim, Assam,
Mizoram and Tripura.
The Japanese
government's clarification suggests that at least in Arunachal - and along the
strategically significant China border where India's infrastructure is
especially lagging behind that of its neighbour - the BRO will have to move
forward without Tokyo's assistance.
Sikkim’s Karma Bhutia felicitated,
places India on Global IT software landscape
PM
Modi’s “MakeInIndia” campaign gets a
boost from Sikkim
Gangtok, Nov 29: Sikkim-based Demi Solutions
founder Karma Bhutia was felicitated and awarded “Best Exhibitor” at CeBIT
India – Bangalore ITE.biz, the biggest Information Technology event held in
India with over 600 brands and more than 300 exhibitors and over 1 lakh
visitors and participants from over 35 countries.
Bhutia
has been invited to participate and showcase these innovations and solutions at
CeBIT - Hannover Germany, which will be held in March 2015.
CeBIT
is the World’s leading Business IT and ICT event held annually in Hannover in
Germany. This year for the first time CeBIT tied up with BangaloreITE.biz to
launch the CeBIT India a 3-day event from the 12th – 14th November 2014.
In
this event, STPI a lead sponsor hosted 127 MSME units from 21 states across the
country at STPI “MakeInIndia” pavilion to showcase the potential of the
IT/ITeS/ESDM start-ups in India. This is to enable the prospective investors
for supporting the “MakeInIndia” programme, which was recently launched by
Prime Minister. Narendra Modi.
As
part of “MakeInIndia” pavilion Karma Bhutia – an entrepreneur/innovatorwith
expertise in eGovernance, BigData, Cloud Computing, Mobility & Product
Innovation -showcased Demi Solutions’ frugal innovation built and developed in
Gangtok.
Demi
Solutionssetup India’s first 3D Printing and Prototyping Lab in Gangtok and it
has filed the first patent/intellectual property in software technology in the
whole North East region.
Bhutia,
Founder of M/s. Demi Solution said, “Firstly, I would like to thank Department
of IT, Government of Sikkim and STPI for recognizing our work and nominating us
to showcase our products & offerings to people from other states in India
& to the World at CeBIT India. We at Demi Solutions take immense pride in
showcasing Sikkimese grit, ingenuity and innovation that has been highly
appreciated by participants, delegates and exhibitors from all over the world.
This
is a proud moment for Sikkim/Sikkimese and the people of the North East region
of India that we have finally etched a mark on the Global IT software
landscape. I’d also like to thank my team for their dedicated effort in helping
build these amazing solutions.”
Among
the awardees were IT software conglomerates like Cognizant, Infosys, TCS,
Wipro, GoldmanSach, Ernst & Young, SAP, HP and DELL.
Earlier
on 3rd November 2014 , Karma Bhutia received the Finalist Award at the 5th
eNorthEast awards held in Aizwal Mizoram in the “eGovernance & citizen
service delivery” category.
Thank
you!
The family of the
late Denjong Gyalse Kushon J.T. Namgyal is truly touched by and deeply
appreciative of the outpouring of sympathy and support we received in the wake
of his demise.
While it is not
possible for us to thank everyone individually, we would like to place on
record our heartfelt gratitude to all those who condoled with us in the time of
our bereavement and extended much support during the funeral.
The late Gyalsey
Kushon was not able to lead much of a public life. Despite that, all of Sikkim
gave him such a poignant and emotional farewell. Mere words are thus inadequate
while trying to convey how overwhelmed we were by the massive support we
received all the way to Lukshyama.
We would like to
thank the Hon’ble Chief Minister for declaring a public holiday on the day of
the funeral, as also all the shopkeepers for keeping their business
establishments closed to express their solidarity.
We are grateful
for all our friends, family and well-wishers for rallying around us and for all
the kindness and commiseration.
To all the many
people, too innumerable to mention here, who supported us in every way, we wish
to reiterate our earnest gratitude.
ENVIRONMENT
TASHIDING
HYDRO POWER PROJECT
The fate of Sikkim's sacred river hangs in balance
Sikkim High Court wants
Central Govt to decide on controversial hydel project in West Sikkim
By
S. Dutta
Having drastically
curtailed the width of eco-sensitive zones in Sikkim, the MoEF seems intent on
ignoring local sentiment as well as environmental norms in order to push
forward the Tashiding HEP on the sacred Rathong Chu river. Soumik Dutta reports
on the latest in the case.
The judgment in
the Public Interest Litigation (PIL) demanding the scrapping of the 97-MW
Tashiding Hydro Power Project (or Tashiding HEP) on the sacred Rathong Chu
River in West Sikkim, was pronounced on World Environment Day, 5 June 2014 by
the Sikkim High Court.
The petitioners in
the PIL, both of whom were from the Buddhist minority community of Sikkim,
demanded the scrapping of the project, citing violation of the Places of
Worship (Special Provisions) Act of 1991, apart from gross violations of the
report of the National Board for Wildlife (NBWL) and the Supreme Court order of
2006 in the Goa Foundation case.
The Places of
Worship (Special Provisions) Act of 1991, extended to Sikkim in 1998, details a
list of sacred shrines, rivers, lakes, caves, mountain peaks and even sacred
groves in Sikkim and strictly specifies that no construction or development
projects should be allowed to be undertaken in the vicinity of these places.
There is a
notification by the Sikkim government that reiterates the provisions of the Act
and also identifies the Rathong Chu as a sacred River, along with the Tashiding
Monastery on its banks that is deemed ‘extremely sacred’ and revered by the
Buddhists.
The judgment
pronounced by the division bench of Chief Justice N K Jain and Justice S P
Wangdi passed the ball to the court of the Ministry of Environment and Forests
(MoEF), asking it to take a final call on the matter within six months from the
date of the order.
However, given the
recent notifications from the MoEF on the matter of eco-sensitive zones and
buffer areas, this judgment does not bring any cheer to those protesting the
project on the holy Rathong Chu.
The history of the Tashiding HEP and protests
The genesis of
protests against hydro power projects on River Rathong Chu in Sikkim dates back
to the mid-nineties, when the Sikkim Democratic Front Party (SDF) government
under Chief Minister Pawan Chamling had decided to go ahead with a proposed 30
MW Rathong Chu hydropower project on the River, despite tremendous pressure to
scrap the said project, mainly on religious grounds.
Rathong Chu is
considered to be a ‘sacred’ river, the water of which is used even today for an
annual Buddhist festival – Bum Chu, at the Tashiding Monastery. This has been
an important Buddhist tradition since the time of the erstwhile Chogyals
(Kings) of Sikkim from the Namgyal dynasty.
The earliest
protests were led by prominent citizens in the state, and supported by Buddhist
associations, monks from almost all the prominent monasteries of Sikkim and
devout Buddhists from across the state.
Eventually in
1997, under scathing criticism of infringement on cultural and religious rights
of Buddhist minorities, the Chamling government decided to scrap the project.
Ironically, the same Chamling-led SDF government allotted another project on
the River Rathong Chu, a little further downstream, in the year 2006. In fact,
the project capacity now was enhanced from 30 MW to 97 MW! While the earlier
project was called the Rathong Chu HEP project, it was now rechristened the
Tashiding Hydro Power Project.
Regulatory lapses
The Tashiding HEP
is presently operating in violation of guidelines issued by both the Central
government and the Supreme Court.
According to the
Supreme Court order in force in the Goa Foundation case, there can be no
construction within a 10-km radius of any national park; the Tashiding HEP
being developed by Shiga Energy Private Limited (part of the Dans group),
however, falls well within the 10-km radius of the Khangchendzonga National
Park.
The MoEF
incidentally came out with a draft notification dated 3 February 2014, by which
the width of the buffer zone around Sikkim’s lone national park and four
wildlife sanctuaries has been reduced from 10 kilometres to between 25-200
metres!
Moreover, while
this particular project received Environmental Clearance (EC) from the MoEF on
29 July 2010, neither the project developer nor the state government has
obtained statutory clearance from the National Board of Wildlife (NBWL) under
the MoEF.
The NBWL standing
committee, which sent a fact-finding team to Sikkim in July-August 2013, had in
fact warned the environment ministry in August 2013 that at least six
hydro-electric projects in Sikkim were coming up without mandatory clearance.
These include the proposed Teesta V Project, and the ongoing Teesta III, Dik
Chu, Panan, and Tashiding projects.
Damming and damning the Teesta
While clearance
has still not been granted, construction activity continues at the project site.
The High Court had earlier stated in its interim order in a PIL against the
Tashiding project that this would be at the risk of the project developer.
Documents in
possession of this correspondent reveal that the Wildlife Division of the
Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF) had written to the Principal Chief
Conservator of Forests Sikkim in May 2013, about the status of the Tashiding
HEP.
The letter, issued
by Mr. Vivek Saxena, DIG Forests (WL), MoEF, sought to know "... whether
the construction of the 97 MW Tashiding HEP in West Sikkim is already
underway,” and directed, “if yes, the same may kindly be stopped immediately
until further orders as they do not have necessary recommendations of the
Standing Committee of the National Board for Wildlife." Despite this,
construction continued unabated.
Concerned
officials in the Forest Department consistently avoided enquiries seeking
clarification in this regard. Officials in the Energy and Power Department
meanwhile denied any knowledge of the said communiqué, stating that the Forest
department had not forwarded any such letter to the Power department.
Protests by civil society fall on deaf ears
Meanwhile, on 20
August, 2014, the president of the Affected Citizens of Teesta (ACT), Mr.
Tseten Lepcha served a legal notice to the Secretary, MoEF on the same issue.
ACT is an NGO
fighting for the cause of the Teesta River and Sikkim’s fragile environment.
The said notice, a copy of which is available with this correspondent, has
challenged the draft notification of the MoEF issued on 3 February 2014 as
mentioned above. The notice has called for an interim buffer zone of at last 7
to 8 km, instead of the 200 metres as proposed by the MoEF.
The notice also
made clear that any failure on the part of the MoEF to reconsider its earlier
decision and proceed arbitrarily would compel the ACT to take further
appropriate legal action.
In a memorandum to
the MoEF, objecting to the same notification, the Sikkim Bhutia Lepcha Apex
Committee (SIBLAC) alleged that the proposal would facilitate unrestrained
exploitation of natural resources to the detriment of the state's ecology and
heritage.
“The draft lacks
scientific assessment and overrides the findings of the National Board of
Wildlife, which is part of the ministry and comprises a panel of academics,”
SIBLAC convener Tseten Tashi Bhutia told this correspondent.
“Any project on
the Rathong Chu is not acceptable to us since it is on the waters of the most
sacred river according to Neysol and Neyig Buddhist texts. The water of Rathong
Chu is used by the Tashiding Monastery for the annual Holy Bum Chu festival,”
says Tseten Bhutia, adding that despite so many representations over the
Tashiding project and the sensitivity of the issues involved, the Indian
government had remained adamant and aloof.
“How can the MoEF
decide on the Places of Worship Act and its possible violation?” asks Bhutia,
questioning the recent order passed by the Sikkim High Court of the Tashiding
PIL.
The angst of the
people notwithstanding, with the MoEF notifications in place, the fate of
Tashiding HEP and that of other HEPs in Sikkim, operating in violation of
environmental norms, appear to be secured favourably as far as the government
and project developers are concerned. Environment, ecology, indigenous people,
their culture, identity, religion and in fact, very existence have taken a back
seat.
BOOK Review
Mothers and daughters stretch India’s social boundaries
The Jewel Daughters
By Nina Harkness
278 pages. Trade paperback $14.00. Kindle $2.99.
Like her debut novel A Sahib’s Daughter, this new title by Ms.
Harkness is a multigenerational and multicultural exploration of life during
and after India’s period as a British colony. Spanning forty-five years, it has
as one area of interest the relationships between Indian natives and British
tea plantation administrators, revealing the cultural and racial social
structure during a period of change.
The central character is
Cara Powell, daughter of a Welsh Presbyterian pastor in Shillong, a small city
known for its beautiful rolling hills and as a regional administrative center.
The pastor dies when Cara is fourteen, and her mother Beula, an orphan of mixed
race, struggles to raise her on a slim pension from the church. Fearful for
beautiful Cara’s future, Beula is anxious to marry her off. Rather than
encourage a relationship with a local boy, Avon, she insists on a marriage to
the self-centered and ill-tempered Scottish sahib, Gerard McKenzie, manager of
a tea plantation near Sonari in the state of Assam.
McKenzie takes Cara to
Sonari, but he never takes her in marriage. McKenzie is both crude and cruel.
Cara’s life with him provides some degree of luxury, but she is disrespected
and abused. A man of little education and no tact, he eventually finds himself
overwhelmed by social change, labor agitation and other changes in the tea
business, and especially by the responsibilities of domestic life and
fatherhood.
Cara raises three
daughters. Two are her children by McKenzie. The third is the daughter of a
neighboring indentured laborer named Saptamita, who has returned McKenzie’s
attraction to her. However, this woman realizes that both she and the child
would be better off if the girl (McKenzie’s one year old daughter) was taken
into the McKenzie household and raised as Cara’s daughter.
No comments:
Post a Comment